-- do not modify this or any post - dishonor on you for not leaving even a signature and not abiding by the code
noted from "ION implementation of DTN"
-further automation [for such as: orbiters, landers, probes, sensors, robots...]
-advance outer space appropriate hardware for computing and data storage and service
*Interestingly, web1 was entirely consisting of data being served, while web2 was data being exchanged. The transformation of data into information happens at the user. What is the nature of web3 and would its distributed nature be of interest to such as these endeavors...?
>negotiations for long term arrangements
Re the protection of restricted nature of the digital dimension intended for use in space
-credit past developments from extant space technology where use was found on Earth, or associations
-incl. vacuum cleaner, conveyor belt: how describe this type of trade relation between national space front and commercial front, and if any policy could support/reinforce
( -suppose there were discarded or abandoned developments:
-whether possible to suppose there were items abandoned and marked for discard, in view that all projects must have had substantial potential)
( -yet, declassification affects the momentum of department:
-where relevant, collection and management of content that had undergone declassification as capital held and protected by the commons, reserved for present and future responsible use (?)
(-towards the necessity of separating dev of space nets and earth nets and the Internet
/Missions communications model > Delay/Disruption tolerant network: extant spacecrafts, new nodes
- req economical use of bandwidth for transmission and reception
-nodes having only sufficient computing/storage capacity
> streamlining outer space appropriate computing and data storage to be future oriented
- at a company: in-house novel projects orientational to prevent openness of networks to close and to preserve original vision of Internet
-exchange of
PRIMERS to develop products of utility for Earth from extant/expired (?) space technologies, for
RESTRICTIVE NATURE & DEV of extraterrestrial networks for space use only -
transmissions, extremely expensive objects as orbiters and rovers [in space - equivalent to earlier vision of now-IoT devices as being within closed loops (?)], outer space restricted digital dimensions
The exclusivity of space networks depend not only upon the necessity for orthogonality between bands for the functioning of devices, modules, or units, but
the capital invested and the meaning weighting each item rends the importance of protecting against external forces; for
the spaceworthiness of each rests on the multiplicity of efforts and expenses, and
prototypical nature of each unit and its networks is not replicable but unique by each make.
- Rationale | for restricting networks in Space
units / objects_ capital invested and locked/weighting each
unique/prototypical nature
where enactment is not experimental but
- of utmost spaceworthiness)
- requirement for more automation techniques (for the large number of non-human agents expected to be operative in extraterrestrial environments)
(- defense thinking for restricting outer space networks and their development)
- compare 'exclusionary' versus 'restrictive' quality in networks: commercially driven networks where appropriate can be exclusionary to include measures like encryption and specific security; while communications for astronauts and IoT or internal networking of hardware components necessitate restrictions against external access or even access through common earthbound nets
The dream to be spacefaring unites us.
